<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT THE MOVIES: Nine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackdylan.ca/1071/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackdylan.ca/1071</link>
	<description>Illustrations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:47:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.jackdylan.ca/1071/comment-page-1#comment-2300</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackdylan.ca/?p=1071#comment-2300</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jay, I very happy that you read it, but more so that you like my coat. -- You&#039;re certainly right to point out Fellini&#039;s later work; I should have at least thrown a reference out there out there to Juliet of the Spirits as an example of how Fellini tried to address the feminine perspective.  From what I&#039;ve read, it  (Juliet of the Spirits) is sometimes considered to be the female equivalent of 81/2, a mid-life crisis from the point of view of a woman. And I certainly could see that, though it&#039;s no where near as strong a film in my opinion. &quot;Nine&quot; I think, confronts these issues in a much more simplified, though entertaining, way. (I can&#039;t imagine audiences sitting through Juliet of the Spirits these days). I haven&#039;t seen &quot;City of Women&quot; though I&#039;ve heard that it&#039;s not the directors shinning moment, and possibly even that he was going a bit crazy in old age when he made it. --- Personally, I don&#039;t find 81/2 to be a sexist film, I think there&#039;s a lot in there to provide a knee jerk reaction but if you read between the lines it doesn&#039;t take much to see that it&#039;s really not at all. It lays out nicely a portrait of the male ego, and that in itself, provides ample fodder for attack; but it&#039;s not unkind to women. I like &quot;Nine&quot; because it wrestles with these issues in much the same way that an argument between the sexes often goes. -- It makes you think, &quot;maybe she does have a point&quot;. Even if you (the guy) have a good point too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jay, I very happy that you read it, but more so that you like my coat. &#8212; You&#8217;re certainly right to point out Fellini&#8217;s later work; I should have at least thrown a reference out there out there to Juliet of the Spirits as an example of how Fellini tried to address the feminine perspective.  From what I&#8217;ve read, it  (Juliet of the Spirits) is sometimes considered to be the female equivalent of 81/2, a mid-life crisis from the point of view of a woman. And I certainly could see that, though it&#8217;s no where near as strong a film in my opinion. &#8220;Nine&#8221; I think, confronts these issues in a much more simplified, though entertaining, way. (I can&#8217;t imagine audiences sitting through Juliet of the Spirits these days). I haven&#8217;t seen &#8220;City of Women&#8221; though I&#8217;ve heard that it&#8217;s not the directors shinning moment, and possibly even that he was going a bit crazy in old age when he made it. &#8212; Personally, I don&#8217;t find 81/2 to be a sexist film, I think there&#8217;s a lot in there to provide a knee jerk reaction but if you read between the lines it doesn&#8217;t take much to see that it&#8217;s really not at all. It lays out nicely a portrait of the male ego, and that in itself, provides ample fodder for attack; but it&#8217;s not unkind to women. I like &#8220;Nine&#8221; because it wrestles with these issues in much the same way that an argument between the sexes often goes. &#8212; It makes you think, &#8220;maybe she does have a point&#8221;. Even if you (the guy) have a good point too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Watts III</title>
		<link>http://www.jackdylan.ca/1071/comment-page-1#comment-2285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Watts III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackdylan.ca/?p=1071#comment-2285</guid>
		<description>Most feminist critiques of Fellini I&#039;ve read (it&#039;s been a while - I gave up on that most galling of activities a long time ago: the reading of perspective-based critiques) is guilty, at best, of cherry-picking from his ouevre, missing the interesting gender (er) dynamics of films like Jiulet of the Spirits or even City of Women, in which you&#039;d be hard-pressed to make the argument that Mastroianni&#039;s aging lothario is anything close to glorified.

All of that said, nice piece, Mr. Dylan.  (And nice camel hair coat, too.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most feminist critiques of Fellini I&#8217;ve read (it&#8217;s been a while &#8211; I gave up on that most galling of activities a long time ago: the reading of perspective-based critiques) is guilty, at best, of cherry-picking from his ouevre, missing the interesting gender (er) dynamics of films like Jiulet of the Spirits or even City of Women, in which you&#8217;d be hard-pressed to make the argument that Mastroianni&#8217;s aging lothario is anything close to glorified.</p>
<p>All of that said, nice piece, Mr. Dylan.  (And nice camel hair coat, too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
